Kathmandu School of Law Review

P-ISSN : 2091-2110, E-ISSN : 2773-8159, DOI : 10.46985, Publisher : Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Annual flagship journal of Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal

Volume 2, Issue 1, April 2013
Articles

International and Indian Civil Liability Regime for Nuclear Damage - Operator's Liability v. Supplier's Liability

PDF
  • Sidhant Chandalia
Sidhant Chandalia
2nd year Student, The W.B. National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata
Bio

Published 2011-04-30

Keywords

  • No Keywords.

How to Cite

Chandalia, S. . (2011). International and Indian Civil Liability Regime for Nuclear Damage - Operator’s Liability v. Supplier’s Liability. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 2(1), 87–97. Retrieved from https://kslreview.org/index.php/kslr/article/view/1032

Abstract

Nuclear energy has seen tremendous growth in the last two decades and has a considerable share in world electricity supply. No nuclear reactor can be 100 % safe. Every reactor has a small, but finite chance of catastrophic failure, as seen in Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Fukushima and many smaller accidents around the world, including those in India. Nuclear projects are non-bankable in the sense that they cannot be insured. If they could, the matter would be simple enough. The nuclear plant and every person likely to be affected by radiation would be insured for a suitable sum, but the cost of a disaster and the lawsuits that would ensue make it virtually impossible to insure a nuclear power plant. Hence, there is a need to put an artificial compensation and liability mechanism in place to deal with nuclear accidents. The issue is not merely the amount of compensation to be paid in the event of an accident but also who would be encumber with the bill, the operators or the suppliers, and to what extent.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Savvy Soumya Misra, ‘Radioactive Mirage’ (2009) 2 Down to Earth, 28.
  2. Stephen Tromans, Nuclear Law: The Law Applying to Nuclear Installations and Radioactive Substances in its Historic Context (2nd edn, Hart Publishing 2010) 1.
  3. Ibid.
  4. World Nuclear Association, ‘Nuclear Power in the World Today’ <http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/ inf01.html> accessed 1 March 2013.
  5. Ibid.
  6. PTI, ‘India's 20th nuclear power plant goes critical’ The Hindustan Times (Bangalore, 27 November 2010).
  7. Misra (n 1) 27.
  8. Latha Jishnu, ‘Nuclear Chimera’ (2010) 2 Down To Earth , 22.
  9. John Cherian, ‘Safety last’ (2010) 27 (19) Frontline, 28.
  10. Atomic Energy Act 1962, s 22(1)(a).
  11. U.S. Energy Information Administration, ‘Monthly Energy Review’ <http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf> accessed 28 February 2013.
  12. Suvrat Raju, ‘The Other Side of Nuclear Liability’ (2010) 45 EPW 48, 49.
  13. Lee Clarke, ‘The Origins of Nuclear Power: A Case of Institutional Conflict’ (1985) 5 Social Problems, 32.
  14. DeRoy Thomas, ‘Can We Insure against Liability from Nuclear Incidents?’ (1958) 1 Cal LR 46, 46.
  15. Raju (n 13) 49.
  16. Robin Cowan, ‘Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-In’ (1990) 3 Journal of Economic History, 50.
  17. Tom Vanden Borre, ‘Shifts in Governance in Compensation for Nuclear Damage, 20 Years After Chernobyl’ (2007) 21 Tort and Insurance Law, 261.
  18. John Kemeny, ‘Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island’ (Kemeny Commission, 30 October 1979) < http://www.threemileisland.org/downloads/188.pdf> accessed 2 March 2013.
  19. Raju (n 12) 50.
  20. Ibid.
  21. Anirudh Burman, ‘Legislative Brief: The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010’ (PRS Legislative) accessed 28 February 2013.
  22. Misra (n 1) 31.
  23. Dwight Eisenhower, ‘Address to 470th Plenary Meeting of the UN General Assembly’ (8 December 1953) accessed 1 March 2013.
  24. Jerry L Weinstein, ‘Progress in Nuclear Energy’ (1966) Law and Adm, 9.
  25. Status Report, ‘Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage’ <http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Conventions/supcomp_status.pdf> accessed 25 February 2013.
  26. Tromans (n 2) 168.
  27. Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy <http://www.oecdnea.
  28. org/law/nlparis_conv.html> accessed on 2 March 2013.
  29. Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage <http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/ Infcircs/1996/inf500.shtml> accessed 1 March 2013.
  30. Tromans (n 2) 179.
  31. Vienna Convention (n 29).
  32. Ben McRae, ‘The Compensation Convention: Path to a Global Regime for Dealing with Legal Liability and Compensation for Nuclear Damage’ (1998) Nuclear Law Bulletin 61.
  33. Tromans (n 3) 181.
  34. Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act 2010 (CLND 2010) s 6(1).
  35. CLND 2010, s 6(2).
  36. CLND 2010, s 7(1)(a).
  37. CLND 2010, s 7(1)(b).
  38. CLND 2010, s 7(1).
  39. CLND 2010, s 8.
  40. Jayanth Jacob, ‘Govt set to table N-liability bill’ The Hindustan Times (New Delhi, 1 August 2010).
  41. Burman (n 22).
  42. Siddharth Varadarajan, ‘India resists U.S. pushback on nuclear liability’ The Hindu (Chennai, 22 October 2010).
  43. Pranab Dhal Samanta, ‘N-liability law: “Meeting supplier’s midway”, Govt may fix time and cost’ The Indian Express (New Delhi, 28 December 2010).