Kathmandu School of Law Review

P-ISSN : 2091-2110, E-ISSN : 2773-8159, DOI : 10.46985, Publisher : Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Annual flagship journal of Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal

Volume 7, Issue 1, April 2019
Articles

Indian Constitution Vis-À-Vis The Idea of Secularism: The Role of State in The Ongoing Trends

PDF
  • Divyanshu Chaudhary
Divyanshu Chaudhary
LL.M. Candidate, National Law University, Delhi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v7i1.1204

Published 2021-03-05

How to Cite

Chaudhary, D. (2021). Indian Constitution Vis-À-Vis The Idea of Secularism: The Role of State in The Ongoing Trends. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 7(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v7i1.1204
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

We, the people of India, when the Constitution was drafted, adopted the magnificent path for the equal freedom of right to religion (under Article 25). However, 42nd Amendment, 1976 categorically made this path crystal clear by inserting the term “secular” within the preamble. It is, therefore, the intention of the Constitution makers which endorses the idea of secularism in India. India, that is to say, as a state has no religion but comes out as neutral towards the concept of religion. The Constitution, furthering the idea of values enshrined in the preamble, equally preserves and protects all religions. In this way, the state is certainly bound to abide by the Constitutional virtues of secularism; however, the ongoing trends in India depict otherwise. This paper, therefore, investigates these trends which seem to violate the secular idea of the Indian Constitutional philosophy. The researcher intends to establish as to how the state, in recent times, is involved in matters based on a specific religion and how it affects the very principles which were set by the Constitution makers. It is established that the ongoing trends in India have tremendously impacted the Constitutional ethos (including Constitutional morality) of secularism in India and the state has failed to keep them intact.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Constitution of India, 1950, preamble.
  2. Jon Roper, Democracy and Its Critics: Anglo-American Democratic Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Unwin Hyman, London, 1989, p. 63.
  3. Robert A Dahl, On Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998.
  4. Constitution of India (n 1), part III.
  5. Constitution of India (n 1), part IV.
  6. P.B. Gajendragadkar, The Constitution of India: Its Philosophy and Postulates, Oxford University Press, 1969, p. 11.
  7. Constitution of India (n 1), arts. 25-28. See T.M.A. Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka, SCC, 2002, SC, p. 481.
  8. The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976.
  9. State of Karnataka and another v Dr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia, SCC, 2004, SC, p. 684.
  10. Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala, AIR, 1973, SC, p. 1461.
  11. Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th edition, West, 2009, p. 1474.
  12. The Chambers Dictionary, Allied Publishers, 1998, p. 1495.
  13. Constitution of India (n 1), preamble. “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a [SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC] and to
  14. secure to all its citizens”.
  15. Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD), 9 – 23 December 2012, vol. 1 p. 62.
  16. Ibid, pp. 33-34 (Vol. VII).
  17. P.B. Gajendragadkar, Secularism and The Constitution of India, University of Bombay, Mumbai, 1971.
  18. Constituent Assembly Debates (n 14), p. 823(Vol. VII).
  19. Constitution of India (n 1), art. 25(1), “Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.”
  20. M.V. Pylee, An Introduction to The Constitution of India, Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd, Delhi, 2005.
  21. S.R. Bommi v. Union of India, AIR, 1994, SC, p. 1918.
  22. Ibid. ‘the court criticized the BJP led governments in various states and also its close linkages with RSS for the political gains.’
  23. S.P. Mittal v. Union of India, AIR, 1983, SCR, p. 729. This idea was clearly depicted by the Supreme Court of India in the decision of S.P. Mittal v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCR 729.
  24. Brenda Cossman & Ratna Kapur, ‘Secularism's Last Sigh: The Hindu Right, the Courts, and India's Struggle for Democracy’, vol. 38 (1), Harvard Int’l. Law Journal p. 113, 1997, p. 141.
  25. P.K. Tripathi, ‘Secularism: Constitutional Provisions and Judicial Review’, in G. S. Sharma (ed.), Secularism: Its implications for Law and Life in India, N. M. Tripathi, Bombay, 1966.
  26. Upendra Baxi, ‘The 'struggle' for the Redefinition of Secularism in India: Some Preliminary Reflections’, vol. 44 (1), Social Action, 1994. See, Badrinath Rao, ‘The Variant Meanings of Secularism in India: Notes Toward Conceptual Clarifications’, vol. 48, J. Church & St. p. 47, 2006, p. 54.
  27. Shabnum Tejani, ‘Secularism’, in Gita Dharampal-Frick et al. (ed), Key Concepts in Modern Indian Studies, NYU Press, New York, 2015, pp. 251-252.
  28. Ibid.
  29. Tahir Mahmood, ‘Religion, Law, and Judiciary in Modern India’, BYU Law Review, 2006 available at https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2006/iss3/6, accessed on 6 January 2019.
  30. Donald Eugene Smith, India As A Secular State, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1963, p. 159.
  31. Faizan Mustafa & Jagteshwar Singh Sohi, ‘Freedom of Religion in India: Current Issues and Supreme Court Acting as Clergy’, BYU Law Review, 2018 available at https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/ vol2017/iss4/9, accessed on 6 January 2019.
  32. Prashant Amrutkar, ‘Indian Secularism: Is it a way out to Communalism?’, vol. 72 (1), The Indian Journal of Political Science p. 173, 2011, p.175.
  33. Badrinath (n 25), p. 76.
  34. Ibid.
  35. These organizations are considered main organizations in context of Hindu Communalism. See, Bipan Chandra, Communalism In Modern India, Vani Educational Books, Delhi, 1984, p. 1.
  36. Manini Chatterjee, BJP's Rightwing Communalism: The Political Face of Hindutva, National Book Centre, New Delhi, 1996, p. 2.
  37. Cossman (n 23), p. 116.
  38. Rajeev Bhargava, ‘Giving Secularism its Due’, vol.29, Economic and Political Weekly, 1994, p. 61.
  39. Prashant Waikar, ‘Reading Islamophobia In Hindutva: An Analysis of Narendra Modi’s Political Discourse’, vol. 4(2), Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2018.
  40. Rana Ayyub, ‘Mobs are killing Muslims in India. Why is no one stopping them?’, The Guardian (July 2018) available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/20/mobs-killing-muslims-indianarendra modi-bjp, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  41. Hindi Extremists consider it as a strategy deployed by Muslim man to boost their population in India. See, Mohan Rao, ‘Love Jihad and demographic fears’, vol. 18 (3), Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2011, p. 425.
  42. Omar Rashid, ‘U.P. manifesto: BJP promises Ram temple, 1 GB free data’, The Hindu (January 2017) available at https://www.thehindu.com/elections/uttar-pradesh-2017/U.P.-manifesto-BJP-promises Ram-temple-1-GB-free-data/article17108508.ece, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  43. Maulshree Seth, ‘Yogi Adityanath clears 221-meter tall Ram statue in Ayodhya’, Indian Express (November 2018) available at https://indianexpress.com/article/india/yogi-adityanath-ram-statue-ayodhya-dharmasabha 5463026/, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  44. Manjari Katju, ‘Not a sprinkle, but a spread of saffron’, The Hindu (May 2015) available at https://www.
  45. thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/not-a-sprinkle-but-a-spread-of-saffron/article7245608.ece, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  46. ‘Muslims – India’, 2018, Minority Rights Group International, available at http://minorityrights.org/minorities/ muslims-2/, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  47. Paula Thompson, Rhonda Itaoui & Dr. Hatem Bazian, Islamophobia in India Stoking Bigotry, Islamophobia Research & Documentation Project at UC Berkeley, Berkeley, 2019, p. 18.
  48. It refers that all people should return back to Hindu religion. See, Charu Gupta, ‘Allegories of ‘love jihad’ and ghar wapsi: interlocking the socio-religious with the political’, in Mujibur Rehman (ed), Rise of Saffron Power (Reflections on Indian Politics, Routledge, India, 2018, pp. 104-130.
  49. Minority Rights Group (n 44). See, ‘World Report 2018: Rights Trends in India’, 2018, Human Rights Watch available at https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/india, accessed on 7 January 2019.
  50. Gupta (n 46).
  51. Vishal Yashoda, ‘The coronavirus pandemic intensifies Islamophobia in India’, 5 May 2020, Global Voices available at https://globalvoices.org/2020/05/05/the-coronavirus-pandemic-intensifies-islamophobia-inindia/, accessed on 8 February 2019.
  52. Jayshree Bajoria, ‘CoronaJihad is Only the Latest Manifestation: Islamophobia in India has Been Years in the Making’, 1 May 2020, Human Rights Watch available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/01/ coronajihad-only-latest-manifestation-islamophobia-india-has-been-years-making, accessed on 8 February 2019.
  53. Zarafshan Shiraz, ‘Islamophobia: Bengali School in Indore Forces Muslim Students to Write Class 12 Board Exam Outside Hall Due to COVID-19 Scare’, June 2020, India.com available at https://www.india.
  54. com/viral/islamophobia-bengali-school-in-indore-forces-muslim-students-to-write-class-12-board-examoutside hall-due-to-covid-19-scare-4055939/, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  55. Black’s (n 11), p. 428. This definition is merely illustrative. When examined in Indian Context, one’s caste, profession and sexual orientation have also to be considered. Therefore, it is pertinent to note that the characteristics from which the perpetrator takes motivation can change from one jurisdiction to another. See, D Brax, ‘Motives, reasons and responsibility in hate/bias crime legislation’, vol. 35 (3), Criminal Justice Ethics p. 230, 2016, p. 233.
  56. L Wolff & L Copeland, ‘Violence against women as bias-motivated hate crime: defining the issues in the USA’, in M Davies (ed), Women and Violence, Zed Books, London, 1994, p. 201.
  57. M. Mohsin Alam Bhat, ‘The Case for Collecting Hate Crimes Data in India’, vol. IV (9), Law & Policy Brief, 2018 available at http://www.jgls.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/9th_issue_law_and_policy_ brief_sep_2018.pdf, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  58. ‘Halt the Hate’, 2019, Amnesty International India, available at https://amnesty.org.in/wp-content/ uploads/2019/10/Halt-The-Hate-KeyFindings-Amnesty-International-India-1.pdf, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  59. Ibid.
  60. Katie Harris, ‘India news: Rising religious hate crime reports put India in crisis’, November 2018, Sunday Express, available at https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1039920/india-news-religious-hate-crimerising, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  61. ‘BJP alleges film ‘Kedarnath’ promoting ‘love jihad’, demands ban’, November 2018, Indian Express, available at https://indianexpress.com/article/india/bjp-alleges-film-kedarnath-promoting-love-jihaddemands ban-5440550/, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  62. Amnesty (n 55).
  63. Shyam Sunder Sushovit, ‘Bihar youth thrashed for refusing to chant 'Jai Shri Ram', FIR registered against 7’, June 2020, Times Now News, available at https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/bihar-youththrashed for-refusing-to-chant-jai-shri-ram-fir-registered-against/602233, accessed on 12 June 2020. See, USCIRF Statement on Mob Lynching of Muslim Man in India, June 2019, USCIRF, available at https:// www.uscirf.gov/news-room/press-releases-statements/uscirf-statement-mob-lynching-muslim-man-inindia, accessed on 12 February 2019.
  64. WN. 754, 2073 (2016).
  65. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act’, 2019, The Gazette of India, available at http:// egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210355.pdf, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  66. Aakar Patel, ‘UAPA (Amendment) Bill 2019 violates the very international laws it quotes, defines principles of natural justice’, August 2019, Firstpost, available at https://www.firstpost.com/india/uapa-amendmentbill 2019-violates-the-very-international-laws-it-quotes-defies-principles-of-natural-justice-7104391.html, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  67. ‘The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019’, 2019, The Gazette of India, available at http://egazette.nic.in/ WriteReadData/2019/214646.pdf, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  68. ‘India: Citizenship Bill Discriminates Against Muslims’, December 2019, Human Rights Watch, available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/12/11/india-citizenship-bill-discriminates-against-muslims, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  69. Bilal Kuchay, ‘What you should know about India's 'anti-Muslim' citizenship law’, December 2019, Al Jazeera, available at https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/india-anti-muslim-citizenshipbill 191209095557419.html, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  70. ‘Over the Last Year, the Centre Approved 25 Renaming Proposals’, November 2018, The Wire, available at https://thewire.in/government/over-one-year-the-centre-approved-25-renaming-proposals, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  71. ‘Yogi Adityanathgovt officially renames Allahabad to Prayagraj’, October 2018, Economics Times, available at https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/yogi-adityanath-govt-officiallyrenames allahabad-to-prayagraj/videoshow/66238996.cms, accessed on 13 February 2019.
  72. Omar Rashid, ‘Prayagraj divides Allahabad’, October 2018, The Hindu, available at https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/prayagraj-divides-allahabad/article25274402.ece, accessed on 14 February 2019.
  73. LalmaniVerma, ‘Yogi Adityanath’s double role: Chief Minister and Mahant’, September 2017, Indian Express, available at https://indianexpress.com/article/india/yogi-adityanath-double-role-chief-ministermahant navarati-priest-puja-4867508/, accessed on 14 February 2019.
  74. ‘Allahabad to Prayagraj: Renaming 'Islamic-sounding' places not new for Yogi Adityanath’, October 2018, New Indian Express, available at http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2018/oct/17/allahabad-toprayagraj renaming-islamic-sounding-places-not-new-for-yogi-adityanath-1886483.html, accessed on 14 February 2019.
  75. Samshul Islam, ‘RSS is not just antithetical to Muslims, but to a democratic-secular India as well’, June 2016, Indian Express, available at https://indianexpress.com/article/blogs/rss-is-not-just-antithetical-tomuslims but-to-a-democratic-secular-india-as-well-2845298/, accessed on 14 February 2019.
  76. Tahir (n 28).
  77. Jocelyn Maclure & Charles Taylor, The Principles of Secularism in Secularism and Freedom of Conscience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 20-21.
  78. Ibid.
  79. Refer to Section III of this paper.
  80. George Grote, A History of Greece, Routledge, London, 2000, p. 93.
  81. Such as in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India or in the Indian Young Lawyers Association case (Sabrimala Temple case).
  82. Manoj Narula v. Union of India, SCC, 2014, SC p. 1.
  83. SCALE, 2018, p. 72.
  84. Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., SCC, 2018, SC, p. 1.
  85. Ibid, para 131.
  86. Ibid, para 598.
  87. Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. State of Kerala, SCC, 2018, SC, p. 1690.
  88. Ibid, para 106.
  89. An idea wherein the minority is said to be pleased.
  90. Such as freedom of speech and expression.
  91. Neera Chandhoke, ‘Why Secularism is in Crisis Today’, August 2018, The Wire, available at https://thewire.in/religion/secularism-india-democracy-pluralism, accessed on 14 February 2019.
  92. Shabnum (n 26), p. 254.