Kathmandu School of Law Review

P-ISSN : 2091-2110, E-ISSN : 2773-8159, DOI : 10.46985, Publisher : Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Annual flagship journal of Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal

Volume 7, Issue 2, November 2019
Articles

The Conservation of African Elephants under the CITES International Ivory Trade Ban

PDF
  • Tatenda Leopold Chakanyuka
Tatenda Leopold Chakanyuka
Doctoral Candidate in International Law, The Institute of International Law, Wuhan University School of Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v7i2.1210

Published 2021-03-08

How to Cite

Chakanyuka, T. L. (2021). The Conservation of African Elephants under the CITES International Ivory Trade Ban. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 7(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v7i2.1210
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

1989 CITES decision to put a total ban on international trade in ivory and the decisions to allow the 1999 and 2008 one-off-sales have generated polarized debates on whether or not these decisions are the reasons behind increasing levels of poaching in Africa. An undisputed fact is that; international illegal ivory trade has promoted rampant elephant poaching in Africa. What has and is contested is whether the ban or the one-off sales have a role to play in the current elephant poaching and increase in the illegal ivory trade. The Southern African range countries blame the international ivory trade ban for the current ivory poaching levels, while Countries such as Kenya, Benin and Uganda have blamed the sales for reigniting international appetite for ivory. The available evidence suggests that the international ivory trade ban with an unbanned domestic market has promoted poaching and negatively impacted on range countries’ ability to effectively and sustainably protect elephants. Besides the reduction or elimination of revenue, the ban undermined the economic incentives associated with elephant conservation, thereby making elephant conservation unattractive, unachievable and subsequently opening up to poaching and illegal trade.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Caitlin O’Connell-Rodwell and Rob Parry-Jones, ‘An Assessment of China’s Management of Trade in Elephants and Elephant Products’, TRAFFIC East Asia, 15 July 2002.
  2. Yollanda Washaya & Jeffrey Kurebwa, 'Effectiveness of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in Curbing Elephant Poaching in Zimbabwe', vol. 1, IAR J Bus Mng p. 38, 2020, p.38.
  3. Andrew M. Lemieux & Ronald V. Clarke, 'The International Ban on Ivory Sales and Its Effects on Elephant Poaching in Africa'. vol.49, BJC p.451, 2009, p. 453.
  4. Joseph Vandergrift, ‘Elephant Poaching: CITES Failure to combat the Growth in Chinese Demand for Ivory’, vol. 31, VELJ p. 102, 2013, pp. 109-111.
  5. Ryan Cole, ‘The Effect of International Trade Bans on the Population of Endangered Species’, PSJIA p. 35, 2012, p. 35.
  6. Denis Farrell, ‘African countries want to lift ban on ivory sale and elephant hunting’, Washington Post ,Washington, 8 May 2019, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/kidspost/africancountries want-to-lift-ban-on-ivory-sale-and-elephant-hunting/2019/05/08/e3a1acee-71af-11e9-9f06-5fc2ee80027a_story.html?utm_term=.18deece82648, accessed on 30 April 2020.
  7. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), 983 UNTS 243, entered into force 7 July 1975.
  8. Elisabeth M. McOmber, ‘Problems in Enforcement of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species’, vol. 2, BJIL p. 673, 2002, p. 675.
  9. David Harland, ‘Jumping on the “Ban” Wagon: Efforts to Save the African Elephant’, vol. 14, FFWA p. 284, 1990.
  10. CITES classified animals and plants into three appendices depending on the threat to the species. Appendix 1 is of all species that are in danger of extinction, and commercial trade of those species or their specimens is prohibited. Appendix II is for species not threatened with extinction but may suffer decline if commercial trade in the species or their specimens is not restricted. Appendix III is of species controlled in one party and has asked other parties to control international trade.
  11. ‘CITES and Elephants, what is the “Global Ban” on Ivory Trade?’ US Fish and Wildlife Services International, November 2013 available at https://www.fws.gov/le/pdf/CITES-and-Elephant-Conservation.pdf, accessed on 23 January 2017.
  12. CITES, ‘Establishing a Long Term System for Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE)’, 1997, Cop 10 Resolution Conf 10.10.
  13. US Fish and Wildlife Services International (n 11).
  14. CITES (n 7), art XIV.
  15. Emily Hutchens, ‘The Law Never Forgets: An Analysis of the Elephant Poaching Crisis, Failed Policies, and Potential Solutions', vol. 31, WILJ p. 934, 2014, p. 958.
  16. Tom Milliken, Robert W. Burn and Louisa Sangalakula, ‘A report on the status of the Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS) to the 14th meeting of the Conference of the Parties’, CITES, 2007, CoP14 Doc 53.2.
  17. CITES Standing Committee, ‘National Laws for the Implementation of the Convention - Annex, Status of Legislative Progress for Implementing CITES’, 2014, SC65 Doc. 22 available at http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/sc/65/E-SC65-22.pdf, accessed on 11 November 2017.
  18. ‘Wildlife conservation in Zimbabwe: A review of the relevant statutes and an assessment of protected areas, conservation and implications of the indigenisation policy’ African Wildlife Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya, September 2011.
  19. Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Act of 1975(2009 amendment); Ann Linder, ‘Detailed Discussion of Elephants and the Ivory Trade’, Animal Legal & Historical Center, Michigan, USA, 2016 available at https://www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-elephants-and-ivory-trade, accessed on 1 March 2019.
  20. Nature Conservation Ordinance of 1975 (1996 Amendment), Namibia.
  21. The Wildlife Conservation and Management Act 2013, Kenya.
  22. Wildlife Conservation and National Parks Act 1999, sch 9, Botswana.
  23. Wildlife Conservation and National Parks Act 1992, revised edition, 2011, Cap 38, 18, Botswana.
  24. Xuehong Zhou et al., ‘Elephant poaching and the ivory trade: The impact of demand reduction and enforcement efforts by China from 2005-2017’, vol. 16, Global Ecology and Conservation, 2018, p. 1.
  25. Ibid, p. 5.
  26. Adam Cruise, ‘China’s Legal Ivory Trade is ‘Dying’ as Price Fall’, China Dialogue, 5 April 2017 available at https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/9717-China-s-legal-ivory-trade-is-dying-asprices fall?mc_cid=bbeb34e600&mc_eid=582de06226, accessed on 6 April 2017.
  27. Busani Bafana, ‘ “Let us trade”: Debate over ivory sales rages ahead of CITES summit’, Mongabay Series: Conservation Effectiveness, 11 July 2019 available at https://news.mongabay.com/2019/07/letus trade-debate-over-ivory-sales-rages-ahead-of-cites-summit/, accessed on 23 March 2019.
  28. Vandergrift (n 4), p. 107.
  29. Katarzyna Nowak, ‘Cites Alone Cannot Combat Illegal Wildlife’, vol. 34, Trade’, SAIIA Policy Insight, 2016, p. 4.
  30. Yvonne Fiadjoe, ‘Cites in Africa: An Examination of Domestic Implementation and Compliance’, vol. 4, Sustainable Development Law and Policy, p. 38, 2004, p. 38.
  31. ‘Mozambique: Diminishing the effectiveness of CITES Rhinos and Elephants Protection’, Environmental Investigation Agency, USA, 2014 available at https://content.eia-global.org/posts/documents/000/000/334/original/Mozambique_Pelly.pdf?1468593671, accessed on 12 March 2019.
  32. Category 1: legislation that is believed generally to meet the requirements for the implementation of CITES.
  33. Fiadjoe (n 30), p. 40.
  34. Ibid.
  35. CITES (n 7), art VIII (7) b.
  36. CITES Secretariat, ‘Status of African elephant populations and levels of illegal killing and the illegal trade in ivory: A report to the African Elephant Summit’, 2013 available at https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/african_elephant_summit_background_document_2013_en.pdf, accessed on 11 January 2017.
  37. CITES, ‘Report on the Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS)’, 2016, CoP17 Doc. 57.6.
  38. CITES Seventieth Meeting of the Standing Committee, Sochi, Russia, and (SC70) 2017SC70 Doc. 27.1.
  39. Daniel Stiles, ‘Only Legal Ivory Can Stop Poaching', Earth Island Journal, available at http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/magazine/entry/stiles/, accessed on 21 March 2019.
  40. Diana S. Weber et al, ‘Unexpected and Undesired Conservation Outcomes of Wildlife Trade Bans—An Emerging Problem for Stakeholders?’, vol. 3, GEC p. 389, 2015, p. 391.
  41. Mary Rice, ‘The Case Against a Legal Ivory Trade: It Will Lead to More Killing of Elephants’, Yale Environment 360, 13 October 2014 available at http://e360.yale.edu/features/counterpoint_the_case_against_a_legal_ivory_trade_it_will_lead_to_more_killing_of_elephants, accessed on 17 January 2014.
  42. Mary Rice, ‘Stop Stimulating the Ivory Trade, Just Stop Trade’, National Geographic, 14 January 2013 available at http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/stop-stimulating-the-ivory-trade-juststop trade/, accessed on 17 January 2017.
  43. Jose L. Tella and Fernando Hiraldo, ‘Illegal and Legal Parrot Trade Shows a Long-Term, Cross-Cultural Preference for the Most Attractive Species Increasing Their Risk of Extinction’, vol. 9, PlosOne, 2014, p. 9.
  44. Wild Bird Conservation Act 1992, USA.
  45. Mark Thornton, ‘Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 157: Alcohol Prohibition Was a Failure’, Policy Analysis, Cato Institute, 1991 available at https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa157.pdf, accessed on 1 April 2019.
  46. Ibid.
  47. IUCN, ‘Trade Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Report by IUCN - The World Conservation Union on the Effectiveness of Trade Measures Contained in The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)’, IUCN Report (09/11/00), 2000.
  48. Philippe Rivalan, ‘Can Bans Stimulate Wildlife Trade?’, vol. 447, JSN p. 529, 2007, p. 530.
  49. Cole (n 5), p. 38.
  50. Ibid, p. 38.
  51. Stephen Pires and Ronald V. Clarke, ‘Are Parrots CRAVED? An Analysis of Parrot Poaching in Mexico’, vol. 49 JRCD p. 122, 2012, p. 127.
  52. Yulia V. Ivashchenko and Phillip J. Clapham What's the catch? Validity of whaling data for Japanese catches of sperm whales in the North Pacific, vol. 2, Royal Society Open Science, 2015.
  53. Stiles (n 39).
  54. Solomon Hsiang and Nitin Sekar,‘Does Legalization Reduce Black Market Activity? Evidence from a Global Ivory Experiment and Elephant Poaching Data’, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series working paper 22314, 2016, p. 27 available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22314, accessed on 1 March 2019.
  55. CITES, ‘Report on Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE)’, 2016, CoP17 Doc 57.6.
  56. Daniel Stiles, ‘CITES–approved ivory sales and elephant poaching’, vol. 45, Pachyderm p. 149, 2008, p. 151.
  57. Ibid.
  58. Elizabeth L. Bennett, ‘Legal Ivory Trade in a Corrupt World and its Impact on African Elephant Populations’, vol. 29, no. 1, Conservation Biology, 2014, pp. 1–7.
  59. Stiles (n 39).
  60. Ibid.
  61. Farrell (n 6).
  62. Ibid.
  63. CITES, ‘Listing all Elephants in CITES Appendix I’, 2016, CoP17 Prop 16.
  64. Kaula Nohongo, ‘Southern African nations threaten to pull out of global wildlife trade pact’, Bloomberg, 28 August 2019 available at https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/science-and-environment/2019 08-28-southern-african-nations-threaten-to-pull-out-of-global-wildlife-trade-pact/, accessed on 21 March 2019.
  65. CITES (n 7), art XVIII; Under this article country, are allowed to make reservations, especially on decisions they are not comfortable with, a thing that has limited the effectiveness of the convention.
  66. Rosaleen Duffy, ‘Global Environmental Governance and North-South Dynamics: The Case of the CITES’, vol. 31, EPC:GP p. 222, 2013, p. 235.
  67. CITES, ‘Actions to Combat Wildlife Trafficking’, 2016, CoP17 Doc 27.
  68. CITES, ‘CITES compliance procedures’, 2007, Resolution Conf 14.3.
  69. Peter H. Sand, ‘Enforcing CITES: The Rise and Fall of Trade Sanctions’, vol. 22, RECIEL p. 251, 2013, p.
  70. ; individual countries such as US and EU have imposed restrictions on Japan in 1986, Taiwan in 1993, while EU imposed restrictions on Indonesia in 1991-1995.
  71. ‘Ivory Trade and CITES’, Humane Society International, 2013 available at http://www.hsi.org/campaigns/ dont_buy_wild/african_ivory_trade.html, accessed on 3 January 2017.
  72. Milliken, Burn and Sangalakula (n 16).
  73. Republic of Namibia Financial Intelligence Centre, ‘Rhino and Elephant Poaching, Illegal Trade in Related Wildlife Products and Associated Money Laundering in Namibia’, Trends and Typology Report No 1, 2017.
  74. Daniel Stiles, ‘The Ivory Trade and Elephant Conservation’, vol. 31, EC p. 309, 2004, p. 317.
  75. Keane A. Jones, Edward Jones and Milner Gulland, ‘The sleeping policeman: understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation’, vol. 11, AC 75, 2008.
  76. Lemieux and Ronald( n 2), p. 458.
  77. Bradley Anderson and Johan Jooste,‘Wildlife Poaching: Africa’s Surging Trafficking Threat’, African Security Brief No 28, African Centre for Strategic Studies, 2014 avilable at https://africacenter.org/ publication/wildlife-poaching-africas-surging-trafficking-threat/, accessed on 1 March 2019.
  78. Zimbabwe National Elephant Management Plan 2015-2020, Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, 2014.
  79. Rowan Martin, ‘The Great Elephant Debate: Let’s Remove Emotions and Pseudo-Science from Wildlife Management and get down to Scientific Facts’, Daily Maverick, 30 June 2019 available at https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-06-30-the-great-elephant-debate-lets-remove-emotions-and-pseudoscience from-wildlife-management-and-get-down-to-scientific-facts/, accessed on 1 March 2019.
  80. Iain Douglas Hamilton, ‘Ivory and Insecurity: The Global Implications of Poaching in Africa before the Committee on Foreign Relations’, U.S. Senate, 24 May 2012.
  81. CITES Standing Committee (n 17).
  82. CBD Secretariat, ‘Interim Arrangements for the Allocation of Funding for Facilitating Participation of Parties in the Convention Process and its Biosafety Protocol’ available at https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop-bureau/cop-bur-2007/cop-bur-2007-travel-funding-en.pdf, accessed on 11 January 2017.
  83. Erica Thorson and Chris Wold, ‘Back to Basics: An Analysis of the Object and Purpose of CITES and a Blueprint for Implementation’, IELP, 2010.
  84. Peter A. Lindsey et al, ‘Potential of Trophy-Hunting to Create Incentives for Wildlife Conservation in Africa Where Alternative Wildlife-Based Land Uses May not be Viable’, vol. 9, Animal Conservation p. 283, 2006, p. 283.
  85. Victor K. Muposhi, Edson Gandiwa, Paul Bartels and Stanley M. Makuza, ‘Trophy Hunting, Conservation, and Rural Development in Zimbabwe: Issues, Options, and Implications’, International Journal of Biodiversity, 2016, p. 8.
  86. CITES (n 7), art XV (b).
  87. ‘Rural population (% of the total population)’, The World bank, Washington D.C.,USA, 2015 available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS, accessed on 12 April 2017.
  88. David Cumming and Brian Jones, ‘Elephants in Southern Africa: Management Issues and Options’, WWF – SARPO Occasional Paper Number 11, 2005, p. IV available at http://www.fitzpatrick.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/275/Staff_And_Associates/Academic_Staff/Prof_David_Cumming/ Cumming_Jones_2005.pdf, accessed on 12 April 2017.
  89. Allan W Maki and Charles Jonga, ‘Hunting is Conservation: The CAMPFIRE Program in Zimbabwe’, Hunt forever, 21 September 2015 available at https://huntforever.org/2015/09/21/hunting-is-conservation-the-campfire-program-in-zimbabwe/, accessed on 12 April 2017.
  90. Haru Mutasa, ‘Zimbabwe`s Elephant Challenges’, Commercial Farmers Union of Zimbabwe, Harare, 20 March 2010 available at http://www.cfuzim.org/index.php/newspaper-articles-2/wildlife-and-conservancies/467-zimbabwes-elepant-challenge, accessed on 12 April 2017.
  91. Matt McGrath, ‘Crime 'Threatens Nearly Half the World's Natural Heritage Sites’, BBC, London, 18 April 2017 available at http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39590117, accessed on 18 April 2017.