Kathmandu School of Law Review

P-ISSN : 2091-2110, E-ISSN : 2773-8159, DOI : 10.46985, Publisher : Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Annual flagship journal of Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal

Volume 8, Issue 2, November 2020
Articles

Lessons from the Pandemic: Technology and Protection for Human Rights in the New Normal Era

PDF
  • Ershad Murtadho
Ershad Murtadho
uUndergraduate Atudent at Universitas Gadjah Mada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v8i2.2156

Published 2021-07-27

How to Cite

Murtadho, E. . (2021). Lessons from the Pandemic: Technology and Protection for Human Rights in the New Normal Era. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 8(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v8i2.2156
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

With millions of people diagnosed with Coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) till date, state governments have turned to using technologies such as contact tracing systems, high-tech camera sensors, or even information surveillance to control the spread of the pandemic. Despite the numerous advantages these technologies have produced, for example, swiftly flattening the infection curve and enforcing health protocols, the implications of maintaining such use of technologies in upholding fundamental human rights going into the post-pandemic ‘new normal’ era is not clear. Experts have debated the compliance of technologies to respect one’s right to privacy and right to freedom of expression when achieving their protective purposes to uphold societies’ right to the enjoyment of health during the pandemic. However, knowing the continuous improvement of technology, and mindful of the absence of the absolute certainty of its usage in the new normal era, whether it relates to the mechanism or the temporal length of its employment, this paper will further delve into such debate in the context of a pandemic-free environment. After considering the different forms and usages of technologies during the pandemic, analyzing the advantages of using technologies in the future, and critically assessing such usages from the perspective of international human rights law (“IHRL”), this paper claims that the technologies which are used during the pandemic must be properly maintained coming into the new normal era. However, several parameters; mainly the functionality of the technology, participation from the general public, and the formation of an appropriate legal framework, will have to become the main focus of governments to ensure the compliance of technologies with IHRL standards.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 3 January 1976, 999 UNTS 171, New York City, 16 December 1966, art. 12.
  2. International Health Regulations, 15 June 2007, 2509 UNTS 79, Geneva, 23 May 2005, arts. 3, 32.
  3. Tedros Adhanom, ‘WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 18 March 2020’, World Health Organization, Geneva, 18 March 2020, available at https://www.who.int/ dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---18march-2020, accessed on 1 August 2020.
  4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 23 March 1976, 999 UNTS 171, New York City, 19 December 1966, art. 12.
  5. See Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers, 2020, Italian Republic, art. 1; Gabriel Crossley, ‘Wuhan lockdown ‘unprecedented’, shows commitment to contain virus: WHO representative in China’, Reuters, Beijing, 23 January 2020, available at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-whoidUSKBN1ZM1G9, accessed on 7 July 2020.
  6. UN Human Rights Committee, ‘CCPR General Comment No. 27: Article 12 (Freedom of Movement)’, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9, 1999, paras. 14-17.
  7. Enhorn v Sweden, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction, 2005, 1 European Court of Human Rights: Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 25 January 2005, Application no. 56529/00, para. 44.
  8. See James P. Bean, ‘Indonesia’s ‘new normal’ a disaster in the making’, Asia Times, Indonesia, 11 June 2020, available at https://asiatimes.com/2020/06/indonesias-new-normal-a-disaster-in-the-making/, accessed on 10 July 2020.
  9. Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, ‘COVID-19: Urgent appeal for a human rights response to the economic recession’, United Nations Human Rights Special Procedures, 2020, Geneva, p. 9, available at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Development/IEDebt/20200414_IEDebt_urgent_appeal_COVID19_EN.pdf, accessed on 3 August 2020.
  10. Aaron Holmes, ‘South Korea is relying on technology to contain COVID-19, including measures that would break privacy laws in the US – and so far, it’s working’, Business Insider, New York City, 2 May 2020, available at https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-south-korea-tech-contact-tracing-testing-fightcovid19-2020-5?r=US&IR=T, accessed on 1 August 2020.
  11. UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12)’, UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4, 2000, para. 16.
  12. ‘Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19: Interim guidance’, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2020, p. 1.
  13. Gabrielle Berman et al., ‘Digital contact tracing and surveillance during COVID-19: General and Childspecific Ethical Issues’, Working Paper No. 1, United Nations Children’s Fund, 2020, p. 11.
  14. Matthew Gillman, ‘How Taiwan Used AI and IoT Technologies to Combat COVID-19’, Readwrite, 11 June 2020, available at https://readwrite.com/2020/06/11/how-taiwan-used-ai-and-iot-technologies-tocombatcovid-19/, accessed on 8 July 2020.
  15. Jane Li, ‘China’s facial-recognition giant says it can crack masked faces during the coronavirus’, Quartz, Beijing, 18 February 2020, available at https://qz.com/1803737/chinas-facial-recognition-tech-can-crackmaskedfaces-amid-coronavirus/, accessed 10 July 2020.
  16. Ifeyinwa Angela Ajah & Henry Friday Nweke, ‘Big Data and Business Analytics: Trends, Platforms, Success Factors and Applications’, Big Data Cogn. Comput p. 1, volume 3:32, 2019, p. 5, available at https:// www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/3/2/32, accessed on 2 August 2020.
  17. Zoie S.Y. Wong, Jiaqi Zhou & Qingpeng Zhang, ‘Artificial Intelligence for infectious disease Big Data Analytics’, Infectious, Disease & Health p. 44, volume 24:1, 2018, p. 45, available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468045118301445, accessed on 1 August 2020.
  18. Nicola Luigi Bragazzi et al., ‘How Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Can Help Better Manage the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health p. 1, volume 17:19, 2020, p. 2, available at https:// www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3176, accessed on 2 August 2020.
  19. ‘Viral Lies: Misinformation and the Coronavirus’, Article 19, 2020, London, p. 14, available at https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Coronavirus-briefing.pdf, accessed on 28 July 2020.
  20. Joint civil society statement: State use of digital surveillance technologies to fight pandemic must respect human rights, Amnesty International, 2 April 2020, available at https://www.amnesty.org/download/ Documents/POL3020812020ENGLISH.pdf, accessed on 23 July 2020.
  21. ‘Ethical considerations to guide the use of digital proximity tracking technologies for COVID-19 contract tracing: Interim guidance’, World Health Organization, 2020, Geneva, p. 4; See General Data Protection Regulation, 2016, European Union, art. 39.
  22. Leo Kelion, ‘Coronavirus: NHS contact tracing app to target 80% of smartphone users’, BBC News, London, 16 April 2020, available at https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52294896, accessed on 30 July 2020.
  23. Sophia Yan, ‘Wuhan’s whistleblowers’, International Bar Association, Beijing, 9 April 2020, available at https:// www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=d0e01d66-e92a-419a-b0e0-2a1732341fad, accessed on 13 January 2021.
  24. Christopher Brito, ‘Coronavirus “may never go away,” World Health Organization warns’, CBS News, New York City, 15 May 2020, available at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-may-never-go-awayworldhealth-organization-endemic-virus/, accessed on 6 July 2020.
  25. Joseph A. Cannataci, Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the right to privacy, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy, 2020, UN Doc. A/75/147, para. 37.
  26. Zaheer Allam, Gourav Dey & David S. Jones, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) Provided Early Detection of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) in China and Will Influence Future Urban Health Policy Internationally’, AI p. 156, volume 1:2, 2020, p. 157, available at https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/1/2/9, accessed on 8 July 2020.
  27. Bragazzi (n 18), p. 2.
  28. See Michelle Roberts, ‘Flu virus with ‘pandemic potential’ found in China’, BBC News, London, 30 June 2020, available at https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53218704, accessed on 15 July 2020.
  29. See Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, ‘Smart city technology makes corona19 procure movements faster and more accurate’, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation Press Release, South Korea, 25 March 2020, available at http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?id=95083710, accessed on 29 July 2020.
  30. United Nations, ‘Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable’, United Nations, Geneva, 2015, available at https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/, accessed on 15 July 2020.
  31. South Korea Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, ‘Korean Smart City’, Smart City Korea, South Korea, August 2019, available at https://smartcity.go.kr/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Smart-citybroschureENGLISH.pdf, accessed on 19 July 2020.
  32. Lessa Lin & Zhiyuan Hou, ‘Combat COVID-19 with artificial intelligence and big data’, Journal of Travel Medicine p. 1, volume 27:5, 2020, p. 2, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC7313798/, accessed on 20 July 2020.
  33. UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment No. 16: Article 17 (The right to respect of privacy, family, home and correspondence, and protection of honor and reputation)’, 1988, UN Doc. HRI/ GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. 1), para. 23; Toonen v. Australia, Human Rights Committee, 1994, Communication No.488/1992, UN Doc. CCPR/C/50/D488/1992, para. 8.3.
  34. Maria Pia Sacco et al., ‘Digital contact tracing for the Covid-19 epidemic: a business and human rights perspective’, International Bar Association, 2020, London, p. 6, available at https://www.ibanet.org/Article/ NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=4b11819d-c580-47fe-b680-19bdbc201328, accessed on 30 July 2020.
  35. ICCPR (n 4) art. 17.
  36. Brian Kim, ‘Lessons for America: How South Korean Authorities Used Law to Fight the Coronavirus’, Lawfare, Washington, DC, 16 March 2020, available at https://www.lawfareblog.com/lessons-americahowsouth-korean-authorities-used-law-fight-coronavirus, accessed on 20 July 2020.
  37. Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act, 2016, South Korea, art. 76-2.
  38. Ibid, arts. 3, 32-4.
  39. UN General Assembly, ‘Promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (Note by the Secretary-General)’, 2014, UN Doc. A/69/397, para. 37.
  40. L.H. v Latvia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction, 2014, Application no. 52019/07, paras. 56-58.
  41. Lindsey O’Donnell, ‘Covid-19 Spurs Facial Recognition Tracking, Privacy Fears’, Threatpost, 20 March 2020, available at https://threatpost.com/covid-19-spurs-facial-recognition-tracking-privacy-fears/153953/, accessed on 4 August 2020.
  42. Stuart A. Thompson & Charlie Warzel, ‘Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy’, The New York Times, New York City, 19 December 2019, available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/ opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html, accessed on 29 July 2020.
  43. See Gaughran v the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction, 2020, Application no. 45245/15, para. 86.
  44. Government of Singapore, ‘How TraceTogether works’, TraceTogether, Singapore, 1 June 2020, available at https://www.tracetogether.gov.sg/, accessed on 25 July 2020.
  45. Berman (n 13), p. 9.
  46. Human Rights Watch, ‘Mobile Data and Covid-19: QnA’, Human Rights Watch, New York City, 13 May 2020, available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/13/mobile-location-data-and-covid-19-qa, accessed on 24 July 2020.
  47. M.M v the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction, 2012, 4 European Court of Human Rights: Reports of Judgments and Decisions, Application no. 24029/07, paras. 102, 188.
  48. Gaughran (n 43), para. 96.
  49. Special Rapporteur Cannataci (n 25), para. 78.
  50. Natasha Singer & Choe Sang-Hun, ‘As Coronavirus Surveillance Escalates, Personal Privacy Plummets’, The New York Times, New York City, 23 March 2020, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/ technology/coronavirus-surveillance-tracking-privacy.html, accessed on 27 July 2020.
  51. WHO Ethical Considerations (n 21), p. 4; See Yojana Sharma, ‘COVID-19 apps – Are there enough ethical safeguards?’, University World News, London, 4 July 2020, available at https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2020070313595443, accessed on 25 July 2020.
  52. Ramesh Raskar et al., ‘Apps Gone Rogue: Maintaining Personal Privacy in an Epidemic’, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, 2020, p. 6, available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08567, accessed on 27 July 2020.
  53. Yuan Yang et al., ‘China, coronavirus and surveillance: the messy reality of personal data’, Financial Times, Beijing/Hong Kong/Shenzhen, 2 April 2020, available at https://www.ft.com/content/760142e6-740e11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca, accessed on 5 August 2020.
  54. Fajar WH, ‘Mengenal Konsep New Normal’, Indonesia.GO.ID, Indonesia, 31 May 2020, available at https:// indonesia.go.id/ragam/komoditas/ekonomi/mengenal-konsep-new-normal, accessed on 23 July 2020.
  55. UN Human Rights Council, ‘The right to privacy in the digital age (Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights)’, 2014, UN Doc. A/27/37, para. 18.
  56. Roba Abbas & Katina Michael, ‘The coronavirus contact tracing app won’t log your location, but it will reveal who you hang out with’, The Conversation, Australia, 16 April 2020, available at https:// theconversation.com/the-coronavirus-contact-tracing-app-wont-log-your-location-but-it-will-reveal-whoyouhang-out-with-136387, accessed on 26 July 2020.
  57. See Aradhana Aravindan & Sankalp Phariyal, ‘Bluetooth phone apps for tracking COVID-19 show modest early results’, Reuters, Singapore/New Delhi, 21 April 2020, available at https://www.reuters.com/article/ us-health-coronavirus-apps/bluetooth-phone-apps-for-tracking-covid-19-show-modest-early-resultsidUSKCN2232A0, accessed on 23 July 2020; See IDPC Act (n 38), art. 6.
  58. See Croatia Ombudsmen, ‘It is important to precisely determine whose data will be collected and to envisage monitoring’, Office of the Ombudsmen, Croatia, 30 March 2020, available at https://www.ombudsman.hr/ en/it-is-important-to-precisely-determine-whose-data-will-be-collected-and-to-monitor-the-procedure/, accessed on 4 August 2020.
  59. Rita de Cássia Costa da Silva, Marcelo Caldeira Pedroso & Paola Zucchi, ‘Ombudsman in health care: case study of a municipal health ombudsman’, Rev Saúde Pública p. 134, volume 48:1, 2014, pp. 137-138, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206117/, accessed on 1 August 2020.
  60. See Laszlo Horvath, Susan Banducci & Oliver James, ‘Citizens’ Attitudes to Contact Tracing Apps’, Journal of Experimental Political Science p. 1, 2020, pp. 10-11, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/ journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science/article/citizens-attitudes-to-contact-tracing-apps/ F9B8B8CFE051E6D89C3C9ADD6DF76019, accessed on 16 January 2021.
  61. WHO Ethical Considerations (n 21), p. 3.
  62. See Chiara Farronato et al., ‘How to Get People to Actually Use Contact-Tracing Apps’, Harvard Business Review, Massachusetts, 15 July 2020, available at https://hbr.org/2020/07/how-to-get-people-to-actuallyusecontact-tracing-apps, accessed on 18 January 2021.
  63. Gilbert W. Beebe, ‘Long-Term Follow-Up is a Problem’, American Journal of Public Health p. 245, volume 73:3, 1983, p. 246, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1650576/, accessed on 19 July 2020.
  64. Manfred Nowak, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, N.P. Engel, Germany, 2ndedition, 2005, p. 445. [Nowak]
  65. ICCPR (n 4), art. 19(3)(b).
  66. Nowak (n 64), p. 212.
  67. UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment No. 34 – Article 19: Freedom of opinion and expression’, 2011, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/34, p. 34.
  68. See Cissy Zhou, ‘Coronavirus: Whistle-blower Dr. Li Wenliang confirmed dead of the disease at 34, after hours of chaotic messaging from hospital’, South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, 7 February 2020, available at https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3049411/coronavirus-li-wenliang-doctor-whoalertedauthorities-outbreak, accessed on 15 July 2020.
  69. Regulations for the Protection and Management of the International Networking of Computer Information Networks, 1997, People’s Republic of China, art. 5.
  70. David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, David Kaye, 2015, UN Doc. A/HRC/29/32, para. 11.
  71. Ibid, para. 23; General Comment No. 34 (n 67), para. 11.
  72. Farid Rahimi & Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi, ‘Transparency and information sharing could abate the COVID-19 pandemic’, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology p. 1366, volume 41:11, 2020, p. 2, available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32319880/, accessed on 26 July 2020.
  73. General Comment No. 14 (n 11), para. 12(b).
  74. See Nowak (n 64), p. 466.
  75. Lotus Ruan, Jeffrey Knockel & Masahi Crete-Nishihata, ‘Censored Contagion: How Information on the Coronavirus is Managed on Chinese Social Media’, The Citizen Lab, Toronto, 3 March 2020, available at https://citizenlab.ca/2020/03/censored-contagion-how-information-on-the-coronavirus-is-managedonchinese-social-media/, accessed on 17 July 2020.
  76. Vladimir Kharitonov v Russia, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment on Merits and Just Satisfaction, 2020, Application no. 10795/14, paras. 6-7.
  77. David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, 2018, UN Doc. A/HRC/38/35, para. 31.
  78. Chris Marsden & Trisha Meyer, ‘Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence: effects of disinformation initiatives on freedom of expression and media pluralism’, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2019, Brussels, p. 17, available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ b8722bec-81be-11e9-9f05-01aa75ed71a1, accessed on 20 July 2020.
  79. Billy Perrigo, ‘Facebook is Notifying Users Who Have Shared Coronavirus Misinformation. Could It Do the Same for Politics?’, Time, New York City, 16 April 2020, available at https://time.com/5822372/ facebook-coronavirus-misinformation/, accessed on 24 July 2020.
  80. Kaye 2015 Report (n 70), para. 7.
  81. David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Disease pandemics and the freedom of opinion and expression (Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression), 2020, UN Doc. A/HRC/44/49, para. 14; Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, 2013, UN Doc. A/HRC/23/40, paras. 44, 50.
  82. Kharitonov (n 76), paras. 46.
  83. Ibid, paras. 37-38.
  84. Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusof et al., ‘Sharing Information on COVID-19: the ethical challenges in the Malaysian setting’, Asian Bioethics Review p. 1, volume 12:4, 2020, pp. 6, 9, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC7315401/, accessed on 9 January 2021.
  85. See General Comment No. 14 (n 11), paras. 55-56.
  86. Edward Gu & Lantian Li, ‘Crippled community governance and suppressed scientific/professional communities: a critical assessment of failed early warning for the COVID-19 outbreak in China’, Journal of Chinese Governance p. 160, volume 5:2, 2020, pp. 165-166, available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/fu ll/10.1080/23812346.2020.1740468, accessed on 17 January 2021.
  87. Special Rapporteur Rue (n 81), para. 51.
  88. ICCPR (n 4), art. 2
  89. Gu & Li (n 86), p. 166.
  90. ICESCR (n 1), art. 12.
  91. Tom Randall et al., ‘More Than 39.7 Million Shots Given: Covid-19 Vaccine Tracker’, Bloomberg, United States, 2021, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-globaldistribution/, accessed on 17 January 2021.
  92. Jing-Bao Nie & Carl Elliott, ‘Humiliating Whistle-Blowers: Li Wenliang, the Response to Covid-19, and the Call for a Decent Society’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry p. 543, volume 17:4, 2020, p. 547, available at https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445730/, accessed on 14 January 2021; Yan (n 23).
  93. See Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli, ‘International Responsibility of States for Transnational Epidemics and Pandemics: the case of COVID-19 from the People’s Republic of China’, Revista de Direito Civil Contemporâneo p. 1, volume 23, p. 33, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=3584944, accessed on 20 January 2021.
  94. See Vigjilenca Abazi, ‘Truth Distancing? Whistleblowing as Remedy to Censorship during COVID-19’, European Journal of Risk Regulation p. 375, volume 11:2, 2020, p. 379, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242766/, accessed on 10 January 2021; Gu & Li (n 86), p. 163.
  95. See Kaye 2015 Report (n 70), para. 32; See Gu & Li (n 86), p. 166.