Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): An Accommodating Tool for Business Enterprises to Respect Human Rights
Published 2013-05-31
How to Cite
Abstract
This article articulates on number of issues on CSR with an analysis of the importance in safeguarding human rights. It explains the comprehendible understanding of CSR and how it has evolved. Further, it highlights what should be the role of human right commission of Nepal in promoting CSR and what should be the corporate behavior of business enterprises under CSR in Nepal upon examination of human rights treaties and exploration of the specific business risks posed by the CSR dilemma. It makes some suggestions on range of actions that responsible business enterprises can take in order to respect and encourage human rights protection.
Downloads
References
- Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. It is a landmark English case based on UK company
- law . In this case the court upholds the doctrine of company being separate corporate legal
- personality. As decided therein, creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company's
- shareholders for demanding payment of outstanding debts.
- See Elisabet Garriga & Dome`nec Mele, ‘Corporate Social Responsibilities Theory: Mapping the
- Territory’ (2004) 53 Journal of Business Ethics 51, 51–71.
- Archie B. Carroll, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility- Evolution of a Definitional Construct’
- (September 1999) 38(3) Business & Society 268, Vol. 38, 268-295.
- Ibid 269.
- Ibid 273.
- Garriga & Mele (n 3).
- ‘UN Global Compact: Nepal’ (UN Business) <http://business.un.org/en/documents/133>, accessed
- April 2013.
- (U.N. Sub-commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights)
- <http://www.jussemper.org/Resources/Corporate%20Activity/Resources/CSRandHRnorms.pdf>
- accessed 1 March 2013.
- ‘Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy’ (ILO
- Standard)
- <http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:3149253107920436::NO:62:P62_LIST_ENTRIE
- _ID:2453910:NO>, accessed 2 April 2013.
- ‘The Global Compact’ (UN Procurement Division, 25 October 2004)
- < http://www.un.org/Depts/ptd/global.htm> accessed 2 March 2013.
- Initially there were nine principles. ‘The Ten Principles’ (UN Global Compact, 24 June
- <http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html>, accessed 2
- March 2013.
- The report is called as '2011 Annual Review of Business Policies and Actions to Advance
- Sustainability'. In 2011, 1,325 companies from over 100 countries responded to the Global Compact
- Implementation Survey –making it the largest annual study conducted on corporate responsibility
- policies and practices by business globally. See Global Compact, Annual Review of Business
- Policies and Actions to Advance Sustainability (2011)
- <http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/annual_review.html> accessed 25 March 2013.
- ‘Nepal: Status of Ratification of Key International Instruments’ (Human Rights Treaty Monitoring
- Coordination Committee, 11 February 2008)
- <http://www.insec.org.np/files/documents/Nepal_Treaties.pdf> accessed 29 April 2013.
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- See ‘List of ILO Core Conventions’ (ILO Policy, 28 July 2010)
- <http://www.ilo.org/asia/decentwork/dwcp/WCMS_143046/lang--en/index.htm> accessed 1 March
- These rights are as also enshrined as fundamental rights of people in Nepal. See Interim
- Constitution of Nepal 2007, art 12-32.
- Global Compact (n 13).
- Ibid.
- Global Compact (n 13).
- On 28 July 2010 UN published the news stating that Safe and clean drinking water and sanitation is
- a human right essential to the full enjoyment of life and all other human rights, the General
- Assembly declared today, voicing deep concern that almost 900 million people worldwide do not
- have access to clean water. ‘Safe Drinking Water as Human Right’ (UN News Story Service)
- <http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=35456#.UWskEqJTCSo>, accessed 25 March
- Global Compact (n 13).
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- Global Compact (n 13).