Kathmandu School of Law Review

P-ISSN : 2091-2110, E-ISSN : 2773-8159, DOI : 10.46985, Publisher : Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Annual flagship journal of Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal

Volume 12, Issue 1, April 2023
Articles

Regional Participation in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security under the UN Charter: The Case of African Union and its Sub-Regional Organisations

PDF
  • Tatenda Leopold Chakanyuka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v12i1.2222

Published 2024-07-26

Keywords

  • Security Council, African Union, Regional Organisations, Peace and Security, UN Charter, Chapter VIII.

How to Cite

Chakanyuka, T. L. (2024). Regional Participation in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security under the UN Charter: The Case of African Union and its Sub-Regional Organisations. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 12(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v12i1.2222
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Under Chapter VIII of the UN Charter, the African Union shares the responsibility of maintaining international peace and security and finding African solutions in addressing conflicts on the African continent. Article 52 allows for the setting up of regional organisations to complement the work of the UN, especially in the peaceful settlement of disputes in terms of the Charter. Article 53 establishes a working relationship between regional organisations and the Security Council when it comes to the use of force. The operations of the regional organisations in terms of use of force are directly linked with the Security Council as they cannot act independently of the Security Council. While the Security Council can utilise the regional organisations in peace enforcement, the regional organisations cannot act outside of the UN Charter. On the one hand, the Security Council has neglected conflicts in Africa. On the other hand, it has significantly interfered with the efforts of the region to promote peace and security. There is a need to enhance and reinterpret Chapter VIII on regional arrangements for lasting solutions to be found. The Security Council must be able to take note and pay much attention to views coming from the regional organisations that are closer and with a deep understanding of the on the ground situation. Greater, constant communication channels between the Security Council and the regional organisation must be opened. The African Union should also utilise presently available avenues under the UN Charter to push for greater participation in the maintenance of international peace and security and must enhance its capacity to deal with peace and security issues on the continent.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Security Council Verbatim Records, 15 April 2013, UN Doc S/PV.6946.
  2. ‘Security Council Must Expand, Adapt to Current Realities or Risk Losing Legitimacy, Delegates Tell General Assembly amid Proposals for Reform: United Nations, GA 12217, available at https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12217.doc.htm.
  3. Brian Cox, ‘United Nations Security Council Reform: Collected Proposals and Possible Consequences’, South Carolina Journal International Law and Business, volume 6, 2009, p.89.
  4. Ville Lattila and Aleksi Ylonen, ‘United Nations Security Council Reform Revisited: A Proposal’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, volume 30, 2019, p.164.
  5. ‘The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: the Ezulwini Consensus’, African Union, Ext/Ex.CL/2 (VII).
  6. Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI, art. 52 (1).
  7. Security Council Verbatim Records, 15 April 2013, UN Doc S/PV.6946, p.2.
  8. Ibid.
  9. UN Charter, art. 24.
  10. Certain Expenses of United Nations (Article 17, Paragraph 2, of the Charter), Advisory Opinion, 1962, ICJ Rep, p. 151.
  11. UN Charter art. 25.
  12. Ibid, art. 39.
  13. Ibid, art 42.
  14. Monica Lourders de la Serna Galvan, ‘Interpretation of Article 39 of the UN Charter (Threats to Peace) by the Security Council: Is the Security Council a Legislator’, Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, volume 11, 2011, p. 147.
  15. Tadić Case, Prosecutor v. Tadić, ICTY, Decision on Defense Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 1995, Case no. IT-94-I.
  16. Robert Cryer, ‘The Security Council and article 39: A threat to Coherence’, Journal of Armed Conflict Law, volume 1, 1996, pp. 161-165.
  17. Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of the Charter) (Advisory Opinion), 1948, ICJ Rep, p.57.
  18. Sabina Dipalo, ‘The Security Council’s Non-Determination of a Threat to the Peace as a Breach to International Law’, Pecs Journal of International and European Law, volume 1, 2018, pp. 61-68.
  19. Tamsin P. Paige, ‘Willfully Blind: The Security Council’s Response to Genocide in Rwanda’, Journal of International Peacekeeping, volume 22, 2020, p.136.
  20. Karel Kovanda, ‘The Czech Republic on the UN Security Council: The Rwandan Genocide’, Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, volume 2, 2010, pp. 192-198.
  21. 'Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations', United Nations General Assembly, 21 August 2000, UN Doc A/55/305-S/ 2000/809.
  22. ‘Adopted by the Peace and Security Council (PSC) of the African Union (AU) at its 967th meeting held on 26 November 2020, on the situation in the Horn of Africa: How best to support the transitions in Somalia, South Sudan and Sudan’, Peace and Security Council of the African Union, 26 November 2020, PSC/PR/COMM. (CMLXVII).
  23. UNSC S/RES/1973, 17 March 2011; UNSC S/RES/1975, 30 March 2011.
  24. Marjorie Cohn, ‘The Responsibility to Protect: The Cases of Libya and Ivory Coast’, E- International Relations, 2011.
  25. ‘Calls for Greater Inclusion of Elected Security Council Members, Limited Veto Use in Addressing Atrocity Crimes Dominate Open Debate on Working Methods’, United Nations Security Council, 8 February 2018, Press Release SC/13197.
  26. Martin Binder, ‘The Politicization of International Security Institutions: The UN Security Council and NGOs’, 2008, WZB Discussion Paper No SP IV 2008-305.
  27. Ian Hurd, ‘Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform’, Global Governance, volume 14, 2008, pp.199-211.
  28. Daniel Moeckli & Raffael N. Fasel, ‘A Duty to Give Reasons in the Security Council: Making Voting Transparent, International Organizations Law Review, volume 14, 2017 p.13; UNSC, 26 November 2012, UN Doc. S/PV.6870, p.17 . 29 UNSC Verbatim Records, 26 November 2012, UN Doc. S/PV.6870, p. 17.
  29. UNSC Res 1809, 16 April 2008, UN Doc S/RES/1809.
  30. Ibid.
  31. UNSC Res 2033, 12 January 2012, UN Doc S/RES/2033.
  32. UN Charter, art. 52 (2).
  33. UNSC Presidential Statement, 9 April 2019, UN Doc S/PRST/2019/3.
  34. UNSC Verbatim Record, 20 June 1954, UN Doc S/PV/675; Orlando R. Rebagliati, ‘Functions and Powers of the UN Security Council and the OSA in Relation to the Maintenance of International Peace and Security’, Organization of American States, 2000.
  35. Kilian Spandler, ‘UNAMID and the Legitimation of Global-Regional Peacekeeping Cooperation: Partnership and Friction in UN-AU Relations’, Journal of Intervention and State Building, volume 14, 2020, pp.187-194.
  36. Ugo Villani, ‘The Security Council’s Authorisation of Enforcement Action by Regional Organisations’, Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, volume 6, 2002, p.535.
  37. UNSC Draft Res S/3236/Rev, 20 June 1954.
  38. UNSC Verbatim Records, 20 June 1954, UN Doc S/PV675.
  39. UNSC Res 104, 20 June 1954, UN Doc S/RES/104.
  40. Kiho Cha, ‘Humanitarian Intervention by Regional Organisations Under the Charter of the United Nations’ Seto Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 2002, p.134.
  41. UN Charter, art. 54.
  42. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 24 August 1949 arts. 1, 5, 7.
  43. Protocol of Amendment to the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance, 26 July 1975, art. 3.
  44. ‘Statement of Commitment to Peace and Security in Africa: Issued by the Heads of State and Government of The Member States of the Peace and Security Council of The African Union’, African Union, 2004, AU doc. PSC/AHG/ST.(X).
  45. Ibid.
  46. ‘Protocol on Amendments to the Constitutive Act of the African Union’, African Union, 11 July 2003, para 4(h).
  47. Ibid, para 4(j).
  48. Gabriel Amvane, ‘Intervention Pursuant to Article 4(h) of the Constitutive Act of the African Union without United Nations Security Council Authorisation’, African Human Rights Law Journal, volume 15, 2015, pp. 282-283.
  49. Ibid, p. 284.
  50. Ben Kioko, ‘The Right of Intervention under the African Union’s Constitutive Act: From Non-Interference to Non-Intervention’, International Review of the Red Cross, volume 85, 2003, p. 807.
  51. Wyse, Christian, ‘The African Union’s Right of Humanitarian Intervention as Collective Self-defence, Chicago Journal of International Law, volume 19, 2018, p. 295.
  52. ‘The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: the Ezulwini Consensus’, African Union, Ext/Ex.CL/2 (VII).
  53. ‘Statement of the Secretary-General, Presenting His Annual Report to the General Assembly’, 20 September 1999, A/54/PV.4; ‘Report on the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change,’ United Nations General Assembly, UNGAOR 59th Session Agenda 55, 2 December 2004, 272a, UN Doc A/59/565.
  54. Communique of the 565th Meeting of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union, African Union, 17 December 2015, PSC/PR/COMM. (DLXV).
  55. Peter Arthur, ‘Promoting Security in Africa through Regional Economic Communities and the African Union’s African Peace and Security Architecture’, Insight on Africa, volume 9, 2017, p.1.
  56. Ndubuisi Christian Ani, ‘Three Schools of Thought on “African Solutions to African Problems’, Journal of Black Studies, volume 50, 2019, pp.135-149.
  57. Arthur (n 56).
  58. Laurie Nathan, ‘The Peace-making Effectiveness of Regional Organisations’, Crisis States Research Centre Working Paper No 81, 2010.
  59. Cedric de Coning, ‘Peace enforcement in Africa: Doctrinal distinctions between the African Union and United Nations’, Contemporary Security Policy, volume 38, 2017, p.145.
  60. James Dobbins et al, ‘How African Institutions Help Keep the Peace’, The Africa Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes, 2019.
  61. Cedric de Coning, ‘Africa and UN Peace Operations: Implications for the Future Role of Regional Organisations’ in Cedric de Coning and Mateja Peter (eds), United Nations Peace Operations in a Changing Global Order, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
  62. Denis M. Tull, ‘The Limits and Unintended Consequences of UN Peace Enforcement: The Force Intervention Brigade in the DR Congo’, International Peacekeeping, volume 25, 2018, pp. 167-176.
  63. Coning (n 62).
  64. Moda Dieng, ‘The Multi-National Joint Task Force and the G5 Sahel Joint Force: The limits of military capacity-building efforts’, Contemporary Security Policy, volume 40, 2019, pp. 481-482.
  65. UNSC Res 2391, 8 December 2017, UN Doc S/RES/2391.
  66. Dieng (n 65).
  67. ‘Final Communique of the Extraordinary Session of the Authority of ECOWAS Heads of State and Government’, Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Abuja Nigeria, 11 November 2011.
  68. Peter Tzeng, ‘Humanitarian Intervention at the Margins: An Examination of Recent Incidents’ Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, volume 50, 2017, pp. 415-437.
  69. ‘Decision on the Activities of the Peace and Security Council and the State of Peace and Security in Africa’, African Union, 2016, Assembly/AU/Dec.598 (XXVI).
  70. UNGA Res 2711 (XXV), 14 December 1970.
  71. Yahia H. Zoubir and Benabdallah-Gambier, ‘Morocco, Western Sahara and the Future of the Meghrib’, The Journal of North African Studies, volume 9, 2004, p.49.
  72. Ibid.
  73. ‘Report of the Secretary General on the Situation Concerning Western Sahara’, United Nations Security Council, 19 April 2006, UN Doc S/2006/249.
  74. UNSC Verbatim Records, 15 April 2013, UN Doc S/PV.6946.
  75. Ekwealor Chinedu Thomas, ‘The nexus between the United Nations Security Council reform and Peace Building in Africa’, PhD thesis, University of Kwazulu Natal, 2015, p. 119.
  76. UNSC Verbatim Records, 11 July 2008, UN Doc S/PV. 5933.
  77. Ibid, p.15.
  78. UNSC Res 2303, 29 July 2016, UN Doc S/RES/2303.
  79. UNSC Verbatim Records, 29 July 2016, UN Doc S/PV.7752.
  80. UNSC Verbatim Record, 11 July 2008, UN Doc S/PV 5933, p. 3.
  81. Ibid, p.9.
  82. Ibid, p.5.
  83. ‘AU Summit Decision on International Jurisdiction, Justice and The International Criminal Court (ICC) Doc’, African Union Assembly/AU/13(XXI), 26-27 May 2013; AU Summit Decision on The International Criminal Court Doc. EX.CL/731(XXI), 15-16 July 2012.
  84. Ken Obura, ‘The Security Council and the International Criminal Court: When Can the Security Council Defer a Case’, Strathmore Law Journal, p.118.
  85. ‘AU Summit Decision on International Jurisdiction, Justice and The International Criminal Court (ICC) Doc’, African Union Assembly/AU/13(XXI), 26-27 May 2013.
  86. Ibid; ‘AU Summit Decision on The International Criminal Court Doc. EX.CL/1006(XXX), 30-31 January 2017.
  87. Dapo Akande, ‘The Bolton Speech: The Legality of US Retaliatory Action Against Judges and Officials of the International Criminal Court?, EJIL Talk, 14 September 2018, available at https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-bolton-speech-the-legality-of-us-retaliatory-action-against-judges-and-officials-of-the-international-criminal-court/; UNSC, 69th Session, 7353rd meeting, 22 December 2014, UN Doc. S/PV.7353.
  88. UNSC RES 1973, 17 March 2011, UN Doc S/RES 1973.
  89. UNSC Verbatim Records,15 June 2011, UN Doc S/PV/6555.
  90. Phillip Apuuli Kasaija, ‘The African Union (AU), the Libya Crisis and the notion of ‘African Solutions to African Problems’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, volume 31, 2013, p.117.
  91. African Union assembly Decision on Libya, AU/Dec.385 (XVII), 30 June -1 July 2011.
  92. Christopher Zambakari, The Misguided and Mismanaged Intervention in Libya: Consequences for Peace’, African Security Review, volume 25, 2016, pp. 44-52.
  93. Siba N. Grovogui, ‘Looking Beyond Spring for the Season: An African Perspective on the World Order after the Arab Revolt’, Globalizations, volume 8, 2011, pp. 567-569.
  94. UNSC Res 1973, 11 March 2011, UN Doc S/RES/1973.
  95. Phillip Apuuli Kasaija, ‘The African Union (AU), the Libya Crisis and the notion of ‘African solutions to African problems’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, volume 31, 2013, pp. 117-127.
  96. ‘A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility: Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change’, United Nations General Assembly, 2 December 2004, 87, UN Doc A/59/565.
  97. ‘The Common African Position on the Proposed Reform of the United Nations: the Ezulwini Consensus’, African Union, Ext/Ex.CL/2 (VII).
  98. Efstathopoulos Charalampos, ‘South Africa's Reform Diplomacy and the Legitimacy of the UN Security Council’, Politikon, volume 43, 2016, pp. 429-437.
  99. UNSC Res 2033, 12 January 2012, UN Doc S/RES/2033.
  100. ‘An Agenda for Peace’, United Nations Secretary-General, 17 June 1992, UN Doc A/47/277.
  101. Ibid.
  102. Elias Davidsson, ‘The Security Council’s Obligations of Good Faith’, Florida Journal of International Law, volume 15, 2003, p.541.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.