Volume 13, Issue 1, 2024
Articles

From Domestic Application to ICC: Analysing the Integration of ‘Restorative Justice’ in International Criminal Law

Saheli Chakrabarty
Assistant Professor, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences

Published 2025-01-17

Keywords

  • Restorative Justice, International Criminal Law, ICC.

How to Cite

Chakrabarty, S. (2025). From Domestic Application to ICC: Analysing the Integration of ‘Restorative Justice’ in International Criminal Law. Kathmandu School of Law Review, 13(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v13i1.2233

Abstract

Restorative Justice ideology has emerged in the last three decades as a process indistinguishable from our justice systems’ humane identity. Reliability, healing, and community involvement are the cornerstones of restorative justice, which provides an alternative to conventional punitive justice systems. Applying this versatile process has not only improved the idea of justice in terms of criminal cases but has also led to the restoration of environments in many other settings where ‘justice’ might not be involved in the literal sense. The flexibility and flow of restorative justice ideology are thus essential parts of modern criminal justice and are signs of a paradigm shift. This paper thoroughly examines the conceptual flexibility of restorative justice and its implementation in diverse cultural settings, highlighting different models that adapt to the cultural and social milieu. Thereon, the paper analyses the convergence of this principle of justice outside national borders into international legal frameworks. Lastly, the paper, in its fundamental quest of analysing the ‘Restorative Justice’ models that have been metamorphosised by diverse municipal laws in the realm of International Criminal Law. The paper critically investigates the possibility of successfully integrating restorative justice, which has traditionally been used in national contexts, into the international criminal justice system, especially in the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. 1. Howard Zehr, The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Good Books, New York, Revised and Updated Edition, 2014, p. 40.
  2. 2. The term ‘restorative justice’ was supposedly first used by Albert Eglash in an article. See Albert Eglash, 'Creative Restitution: A Broader Meaning for an Old Term', The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science p. 619, volume 48:6, 1958, pp. 619–22, available at https://doi.org/10.2307/1140258, accessed on 16th December 2024.
  3. 3. Meredith Rossner & Jasmine Bruce, 'Community Participation in Restorative Justice: Rituals, Reintegration, and Quasi-Professionalization' Victims & Offenders p. 107, volume 11:1, 2016, p. 108.
  4. 4. Howard Zehr, 'Restorative Justice and the Gandhian Tradition', International Journal on Responsibility p. 5, volume 1:2, 2017, p. 6-7.
  5. 5. Mark B. Scholl & Christopher B. Townsend, 'Restorative Justice: A Humanistic Paradigm for Addressing the Needs of Victims, Offenders, and Communities', The Journal of Humanistic Counselling p. 184, volume 63:3, 2023, p.186, available at https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.12204 , accessed on 10 December 2024.
  6. 6. Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Policy of Criminal Law, Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2002, pp. 88; Muhammad Shobirin et al., 'Concept of Protection for Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Indonesia Fairly Based on Pancasila', Journal of Law & Sustainable Development p. 1, volume 12:1, 2024, p.5, available at https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2445, accessed on 16 December 2024.
  7. 7. Caroline Levine, Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2017.
  8. 8. Tony F. Marshall, 'Restorative Justice: An Overview', Home Office: Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 1999, p. 5.
  9. 9. Carolyn Hoyle, 'Victims, the Criminal Process and Restorative Justice', in Mike Maguire, Rod Morgan & Robert Reiner(eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 398.
  10. 10. Donald H.J. Hermann, 'Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice: An Opportunity for Cooperation or an Occasion for Conflict in the Search for Justice', Seattle Journal for Social Justice p. 71, volume 16:1, 2017, pp. 72-73, available at https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol16/iss1/11, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  11. 11. Kathleen Bergseth & Jeff Bouffard, 'The Long-Term Impact of Restorative Justice Programming for Juvenile Offenders', Journal of Criminal Justice p. 433, volume 35:4, 2007, p. 434, Journal of Criminal Justice, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.05.006, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  12. 12. Gordon Bazemore & Mark Umbreit, 'Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retributive or Restorative Response to Youth Crime', Crime & Delinquency p. 296, volume 41:3, 1995, p. 300, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041003002, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  13. 13. W.R. Wood, 'Editor’s Introduction: The Future of Restorative Justice?', Victims & Offenders p. 1, volume 11:1, 2016, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1149750, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  14. 14. William Danaher, 'Towards a Paschal Theology of Restorative Justice', Anglican Theological Review p. 359, volume 89:3, 2007.
  15. 15. Catherine Gregoire, 'The ICC: A (Continued) Space for Restorative Justice Exploration', European Forum for Restorative Justice (EUFRJ) 2022 Sassari Conference, Sassari, Italy, 2022, available at https://www.euforumrj.org/icc-continued-space-restorative-justice-exploration, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  16. 16. Alana Saulnier & Diane Sivasubramaniam, 'Restorative Justice: Underlying Mechanisms and Future Directions' New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal p. 510, volume 18:4, 2015, pp. 514–530, available at https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510, accessed on 31 July 2024.
  17. 17. William Bradshaw & David Roseborough, 'Restorative Justice Dialogue: The Impact of Mediation and Conferencing on Juvenile Recidivism', Federal Probation p. 15, volume 69:2, 2005, pp. 15-16.
  18. 18. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1987, Germany, Federal Law Gazette I, 1074, 1319, as amended by Article 2 of the Act of Mar. 25, 2022, Federal Law Gazette I, 571.
  19. 19. German Code of Criminal Procedure, 1987, Germany, s. 155a, states “At every stage of the proceedings the public prosecution office and the court are, as a rule, to examine whether it is possible to reach a mediated agreement between the accused and the aggrieved person. In appropriate cases, they are to work towards such mediation. A case may not be assumed to be appropriate against the express will of the aggrieved person”.
  20. 20. Ibid (n. 16).
  21. 21. Tobias Volz, Restorative Justice in Nepal: An Analysis of the Approach's Potential in Cases of Sexual Violence Against Women, Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy, Euclid University, 2021, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22311.01448, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  22. 22. Samrat Bandopadhyay & Amar Mallick, 'Victim-Offender Mediation: Challenges and Its Importance as ‘Alternate Dispute Resolution for Cyberspace Issues', International Journal of Law, Management & Humanities p. 708, 2022, pp. 708-715.
  23. 23. Kenneth Anderson, 'The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences', European Journal of International Law p. 331, volume 20:2, 2009, p. 332, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp030, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  24. 24. Gordon Bazemore & Mark Umbreit, 'A Comparison of Four Restorative Conferencing Models', Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, 2001, p. 5.
  25. 25. Sarah Mikva Pfander, 'Evaluating New Zealand’s Restorative Promise: The Impact of Legislative Design on the Practice of Restorative Justice', Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online p. 1, 2019, p. 6, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2019.1678492, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  26. 26. Oranga Tamariki Act, 1989, New Zealand.
  27. 27. 'Module 8: Restorative Justice', E4J University Module Series: Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, UNODC, 2019, available at https://unodc.org/e4j/en/crime-prevention-criminal-justice/module-8/index.html, accessed on 16 December 2024.
  28. 28. Mark Umbreit, Robert Coates & Betty Vos, 'The Impact of Restorative Justice Conferencing: A Review of 63 Empirical Studies in 5 Countries', Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking, 2002, University of Minnesota, p. 2.
  29. 29. Ibid.
  30. 30. Christina Parker & Kathy Bickmore, 'Classroom Peace Circles: Teachers’ Professional Learning and Implementation of Restorative Dialogue', Teaching and Teacher Education, volume 95, 2020, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103129, accessed on 15 December 2024.
  31. 31. Estelle Zinsstag, Marlies Teunkens & Brunilda Pali, 'Conferencing: A Way Forward for Restorative Justice in Europe', European Forum for Restorative Justice, 2011, Leuven, p. 62-64.
  32. 32. Jeff Bouffard, Melissa Cooper & Kathleen Bergseth, 'The Effectiveness of Various Restorative Justice Interventions on Recidivism Outcomes Among Juvenile Offenders', Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice p. 465, volume 15:4, 2017, p. 47, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016647428, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  33. 33. Margaret Sybil Mullett, Conducting a Randomised Experiment in Eight English Prisons: A Participant Observation Study of Testing the Sycamore Tree Programme, Degree of Doctoral of Philosophy in Criminology, University of Cambridge, 2015, available at https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/ab545b72-cabc-490e-b503-34ab02c1fd61/download, accessed
  34. on 10 December 2024.
  35. 34. Tenth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, 10-17 April 2000, Vienna, available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/432663/files/A_CONF.187_15-EN.pdf, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  36. 35. R. Thilagaraj & Jianhong Liu (eds.), Restorative Justice in India: Traditional Practice and Contemporary Applications, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017, p. xiv.
  37. 36. United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters, 24 July 2002, UNEcoSoc Res. 2002/12.
  38. 37. Ibid, principle 22 proposes that states are encouraged to evaluate and research restorative justice programmes; principle 21 elucidates the integration of criminal justice authorities into the know-how about restorative justice implementation.
  39. 38. Ibid, principle 9-10.
  40. 39. Mina Rauschenbach & Damien Scalia, 'Victims and International Criminal Justice: A Vexed Question?', International Review of Red Cross p. 441, volume 90:870, 2008, p. 451.
  41. 40. John Kiess, 'Restorative Justice and the International Criminal Court', Journal of Moral Theology p. 116, volume 5:2, 2016, pp. 116-117, available at https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11320.pdf, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  42. 41. Brian McGonigle, 'Bridging the Divides in International Criminal Proceedings: An Examination into the Victim Participation Endeavor of the International Criminal Court', Florida Journal of International Law p. 95, volume 21:1, 2009, p. 96.
  43. 42. Daniel Philpott, Just and Unjust Peace: An Ethic of Political Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, 1st Edition, 2012, pp. 6-7.
  44. 43. Yvon Dandurand & Annette Vogt, Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes, U.N. Office on Drugs & Crime, 2nd Edition, 2020.
  45. 44. 'The 2018 Council of Europe Recommendation Concerning Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters: A Briefing for Europe', Council of Europe, 2018, Belgium, available at https://www.euforumrj.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/pb_on_coe_rec_general.pdf, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  46. 45. Recommendation CM/Rec(2018) of the Committee of Ministers to member States concerning restorative justice in criminal matters, 3 October 2018, CM/Rec(2018), rule 60.
  47. 46. Ian Marder, 'The New International Restorative Justice Framework: Reviewing Three Years of Progress and Efforts to Promote Access to Services and Cultural Change', The International Journal of Restorative Justice p. 395, volume 3:3, 2020, p. 397, available at https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ.000048, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  48. 47. EU Strategy on victims’ rights (2020-2025), 2020, European Commission, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0258, accessed on 10 December 2024.
  49. 48. 'Declaration of the Ministers of Justice of the Council of Europe Member States on the Role of Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters', Conference of the Ministers of Justice of the Council of Europe, Venice, Italy, 2021.
  50. 49. Ibid.
  51. 50. Valentina Spiga, 'No Redress Without Justice: Victims and International Criminal Law ', Journal of International Criminal Justice p. 1377, volume 10:5, 2012, p. 1389.
  52. 51. Ibid (n. 9), p. 407-410.
  53. 52. Conor McCarthy, 'Reparations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Reparative Justice Theory', International Journal of Transitional Justice p. 250, volume 3:2, 2009.
  54. 53. Jørn Jacobsen & Linda Gröning, Restorative Justice and Criminal Law, Santerus Academic Press, 2012, p. 12.
  55. 54. Sergey Vasiliev, 'Victim Participation Revisited: What the ICC Is Learning About Itself', in Carsten Stahn (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2015, p. 1136-1137.
  56. 55. Emily Haslam, 'Victim Participation at the International Criminal Court: A Triumph of Hope Over Experience?', in Dominic McGoldrick, Peter Rowe & Eric Donnelly (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues, Hart Publishing, USA, 2004, pp. 315-334.
  57. 56. T. Markus Funk, 'Victim’ Rights and Advocacy at the International Criminal Court', Oxford University Press, New York, 2010, p. 86.
  58. 57. Salvatore Zappalà, 'The Rights of Victims v. The Rights of the Accused', Journal of International Criminal Justice p. 137, volume 8:1, 2010, pp. 145-146.
  59. 58. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90, Rome, 17 July 1998, art. 65(4).
  60. 59. Sara Kendall, 'Restorative Justice at the International Criminal Court', Revista Española de Derecho Internacional p. 217, volume 70:2, 2018, p. 219, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/26486620, accessed on 11 December 2204.
  61. 60. Matthew Gunawan, Pujiyono Suwadi & Muhammad Rustamaji, 'Comparison of Restorative Justice Implementation in Indonesia, USA, Germany, Poland and Switzerland', Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental e04677 p. 1, volume 18:1, 2024, p. 7, available at https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-055, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  62. 61. Scholl (n. 5), p. 6.
  63. 62. Ivan Potas et al., 'Circle Sentencing in New South Wales: A Review and Evaluation', Australian Indigenous Law Reporter p. 73, volume 8:4, 2004, p. 79, available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/26452472, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  64. 63. Suneeti Rekhari, 'People’s Law and Restorative Justice: The Success of Circle Sentencing in New South Wales', 2006.
  65. 64. 'Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey: Research Report', Ministry of Justice, 2016, New Zealand, available at https://victimsinfo.govt.nz/assets/Publications/RJ-Victim-Satisfaction-Survey-2016.pdf, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  66. 65. 'Crime in India, Statistics Volume-III', National Crime Record Bureau, 2020, India, p. 1287, available at https://www.ncrb.gov.in/uploads/files/CII-2020Volume3.pdf, accessed on 16 December 2024.
  67. 66. Patricia Krieger Grossi & Andréia Mendes dos Santos, 'Bullying in Brazilian Schools and Restorative Practices', Canadian Journal of Education p. 120, volume 35:1, 2012, p. 134, available at https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/697, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  68. 67. Kathleen J. Bergseth & Jeffrey A. Bouffard, 'Examining the Effectiveness of a Restorative Justice Program for Various Types of Juvenile Offenders', International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology p. 1054, volume 57:9, 2013, p. 1070, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12453551, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  69. 68. JLD Kennedy et al., 'Long-Term Effectiveness of a Brief Restorative Justice Intervention', International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology p. 1, 2018, p. 13, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18779202, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  70. 69. Yaris Fajrin & Ach Triwijaya, 'The Concept of Penal Mediation for Defamation Delict in the Indonesia ITE Law as a Manifestation of Restorative Justice', Yustisia Jurnal Hukum p. 362, volume 9:3, 2020, p. 363, available at https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.36167, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  71. 70. Claire Garbett, 'The International Criminal Court and restorative justice: Victims, Participation and the Processes of Justice', Restorative Justice: An International Journal p. 198, volume 5:2, 2017, pp. 198-199, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2017.1339953, accessed on 11 December 2024.
  72. 71. Daniel W. Van Ness et al., Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice, 6th edition, Routledge, New York, 2022, p. 31.
  73. 72. Garbett (n. 70), pp. 203-211.
  74. 73. Nuremberg Judgment, France and ors v Göring (Hermann) and ors, International Military Tribunal (IMT), Judgment and Sentence, 1946, 22 IMT 203, 1946.
  75. 74. Funk (n. 56), p. 24-25.
  76. 75. Bartram S. Brown, 'International Criminal Law: Nature, Origins, and a Few Key Issues', in Bartram S. Brown (ed), Research Handbook on International Criminal Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2011, p. 3.
  77. 76. Edoardo Greppi, ‘The Evolution of Individual Criminal Responsibility under International Law’, International Review of the Red Cross p. 531, volume 81:835, 1999, pp. 536-540.
  78. 77. Genocide in Rwanda April-May 1994, Human Rights Watch, 1994, available at https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/hrw/1994/en/21916, accessed 13 December 2024.
  79. 78. Heide Rieder & Thomas Elbert, ‘Rwanda-Lasting Imprints of a Genocide: Trauma, Mental Health and Psychosocial Conditions in Survivors, Former Prisoners and Their Children’, Conflict and Health p. 1, volume 7:6, 2013, p. 2, available at https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-7-6, accessed 13 December 2024.
  80. 79. 'Victim Participation Before the International Criminal Court', War Crimes Research Office: International Criminal Court, 2007, American University Washington College of Law, pp. 11-14.
  81. 80. Fanny Benedetti, Karine Bonneau & John Washburn, Negotiating the International Criminal Court: New York to Rome, 1994-1998, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2014, pp. 152-160.
  82. 81. Juste Abramovaite et. al, ‘Classical Deterrence Theory Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales’, European Journal of Criminology p. 1663, volume 20:5, 2023, pp. 1663-1680, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415, accessed on 13 December 2024.
  83. 82. Marco Sassòli, 'Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law', in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 113.
  84. 83. Vasiliev (n. 54), pp. 1138-1139.
  85. 84. The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta, ICC, Decision on the Withdrawal of Charges, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji, 2015, Case no. ICC-01/09-02/11-1005.
  86. 85. Ibid, para. 61.
  87. 86. Yidou Yang, ‘The Gap between the International Criminal Court and Victims: Criminal Trial Reparations as a Case Study’, Laws p. 1, 12:4, 72, 2023, pp. 4-5, available at https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040072, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  88. 87. ‘Newsletter December 2007/January 2008 #18’, International Criminal Court Newsletter, Hague, January 2008, available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/33DA9BA7-2454-4D46-B134-990069F0A04F/278446/ICCNL18200801_En.pdf, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  89. 88. Nao Shimoyachi, ‘Between Accountability and Reconciliation: The Making of “the Victim-Centered Approach” at the International Criminal Court’, Global Studies Quarterly p. 1, 2024, p. 2, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae014, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  90. 89. Garbett (n. 70).
  91. 90. Shimoyachi (n. 88), p. 4.
  92. 91. Raquel Vazquez Llorente, ‘Striking a Balance Between Restorative and Retributive Justice: A New Challenge for International Prosecutors’, 2013, p. 2, available at https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1-striking-a-balancebetween-restorative-and-%3a-a-llorente/2bab8e6953dad08316046c02dc8ecdf546ed285f, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  93. 92. Garbett (n. 70)
  94. 93. ‘Five Myths About Victim Participation in ICC Proceedings’, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Report No. 649a, 2014, Paris, available at https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/cpi649a.pdf, accessed 14 December 2024.
  95. 94. Ibid, pp. 6-12.
  96. 95. Ibid, p. 9.
  97. 96. Mariana Pena & Gaelle Carayon, ‘Is the ICC Making the Most of Victim Participation?’, International Journal of Transitional Justice p. 518, volume 7:3, 2013, pp. 533-534, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt021, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  98. 97. Ibid, pp. 520-524.
  99. 98. Archana Vashishth, Sakshi Dudeja & Teena., ‘System of Restorative Justice and Juvenile Justice in India: A Brief Comparative Study with Latin American System’, Mexican Law Review p. 131, volume 16:2, 2024, pp. 138-142, available at https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18895/19124, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  100. 99. Joanna Shapland, Gwen Robinson & Angela Sorsby. Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders, Routledge, New York, 1st edition, 2011, p. 127.
  101. 100. Ligi TK, ‘Introduction of Restorative Justice Practices in Criminal Justice System: An Overview’, International Journal of Criminal, Common and Statutory Law p. 132, volume 4:1, pp. 132–133, 2024, available at https://doi.org/10.22271/27899497.2024.v4.i1b.77, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  102. 101. Dena M. Gromet & John M. Darley, ‘Retributive and Restorative Justice: Importance of Crime Severity and Shared Identity in People’s Justice Responses’, Australian Journal of Psychology p. 50, volume 61:1, pp. 51–52, 2009, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802607662, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  103. 102. Chris Cunneen & Carolyn Hoyle, Debating Restorative Justice, Bloomsbury Publishing, United Kingdom, 1st Edition, 2010.
  104. 103. Annette Vogt & Yvon Dandurand, ‘Restorative Justice in Matters Involving Serious Crimes’, Restorative Justice Note 4, International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, 2018, p. 2, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329882019_Restorative_Justice_in_Matters_Involving_Serious_Crimes, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  105. 104. Vince Mercer & Karin Sten Madsen, Sexual Violence and Restorative Justice: A Practice Guide, Leuven Institute of Criminology (LINC), Leuven, 2015, pp. 13-15.
  106. 105. The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015, India, s. 18.
  107. 106. Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita (BNS), 2023, India, s. 4; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, India, s. 23, explanation clause states "Community service shall mean the work which the Court may order a convict to perform as a form of punishment that benefits the community, for which he shall not be entitled to any remuneration."
  108. 107. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, India, s. 290 states “application for plea bargaining may be filed by the accused within 30 days of framing of the charge and 60 days, a mutually satisfactory disposition is to be worked out between the public prosecutor/complainant and the accused”.
  109. 108. Ramkanta Tiwari, ‘Restorative Justice: Moving Beyond the Silos’, Nepal Journal of Legal Studies p.168, volume 1:1, 2016, pp.168-171, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3340302, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  110. 109. Tobias Volz, Restorative Justice in Nepal: An Analysis of the Approach's Potential in Cases of Sexual Violence Against Women, Doctor of Philosophy, Mediation and Conflict Resolution, EUCLID University, 2021, pp.53-56.
  111. 110. Ibid, p. 166.
  112. 111. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1 July 2002, 2187 UNTS 3, Rome, 17 July 1998, art. 68(3).
  113. 112. Alessandra Cuppini, ‘A Restorative Response to Victims in Proceedings before the International Criminal Court: Reality or Chimaera?’, International Criminal Law Review p.313, volume 21:2, 2021, pp.313-341, available at https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10041, accessed on 14 December 2024.
  114. 113. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC, Trial Chamber I, 2012, Case no. ICC-01/04-01/06.
  115. 114. Juan Marcellus Tauri, ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Globalization of Restorative Justice’, Social Justice p.46, volume 43:3, 2016, pp.59-60, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26405722, accessed on 12 December 2024.
  116. 115. Cuppini (n. 112).
  117. 116. George Mousourakis, 'Restorative Justice: Domestic and International Perspectives', Ritsumeikan International Studies p. 55, volume 33:1, 2023, pp. 68-70, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368988178_Restorative_Justice_Domestic_and_International_Perspectives, accessed on 14 December 2024.